ABC Colludes with Harris Campaign for Debate

An ABC Whistleblower has come out and exposed what occurred behind the scenes, prior to The Trump-Harris Debate. One of Disney's Executives (Disney owns ABC) has close ties with The Harris-Walz Campaign. One of The Moderators, Linsey Davis, was also Sorority Sisters with Kamala Harris. Linsey Davis, during The Democratic National Convention, attempted to compare Donald Trump to The Ku Klux Klan. This is all background information, so you understand the players and their allegiance.

We witnessed the other ABC Moderator, David Muir, interjecting Trump MULTIPLE times to 'Fact-Check' him. These 'Fact-Checks' could easily be debunked or required more nuance as they weren't providing full context. Kamala Harris, on the other hand, was not fact-checked at all. She overtly spewed Lies that even MAINSTREAM MEDIA has revised, such as the "very fine people on both sides" misconception.

Diving deeper to what The ABC Whistleblower exposed, we see that The Harris Campaign was GUARANTEED they would receive the questions beforehand, which they did, AND interventions into Trump would occur, but not for Kamala Harris. There may have also been some manipulation with lights and microphone to slightly undermine Trump.

Here's what this tells us. This is akin to Evidence Tampering, but at the scale of a US Presidential Election. We are looking at SEVERE Charges of Election Interference to all those who are complicit. We are also looking at The Violation of The First Amendment. ABC is a Private Company, but because you're Moderating a US Presidential Election, AND because you are operating as a Government Proxy, meaning you are TIED to The Federal Government in some capacity, The American Public retains all of their Constitutional Rights when interacting with The Platform [ABC].

Because there was manipulation of Information and an adjustment in perception to The Public, The Public DID NOT receive an accurate representation of each Candidate. This is now disrupting the receiving of Information, which is part of The First Amendment. Not only do you have The Right to Freely Speak & Express, but you also have The Right to Freely RECEIVE Speech & Expression. That has been interfered with.

The Department of Justice would be relied upon to induce Charges, but The DOJ is largely Corrupt and ON THE SIDE of The Harris-Walz Campaign. Next in line would be States to levy Charges. The State DOES have Authority if they use the case that their State would be negatively or improperly affected by The Presidential Election and the manipulation of -- they do have a sound argument in this aspect. This wouldn't be Civil; it would be Criminal.